Analyses that have attitudes and you may standard once the based details lack obvious temporal purchasing just like the all of the ideational things have been mentioned concurrently in the standard. Adult perceptions fundamentally exists in advance of child’s thinking and you may, while there is specific dictate away from child’s perceptions to the parental thinking, the majority of this new intergenerational influences regarding perceptions generally operate out of mothers to children (Thornton et al. 2008). Then, previous studies have shown one to attitudes dictate requirement, instead of requirement affecting attitudes (Fishbein and you will Ajzen 2010). It’s useful, although not, to keep the potential of mutual causation ranging from thinking from mothers and children at heart even as we interpret show, while the chances of contrary causation in which standards influence attitudes.
Very first, we checked-out theory step one because of the exploring if the children’s relationship timing perceptions end up like their parents’ thinking (Arrow step 1, Fig. 1 ). Coefficients of linear regression varieties of child’s top ages within relationships receive in the Table 3 . When moms and dads well worth elderly years at the relationships, kids is more likely to well worth old age, although perception size is modest. Per most seasons off best years supplied by a mother or father and you will father was in the a rise away from 0.05 and 0.07 years, respectively, during the child’s best many years (Designs 1 and you can 2). These types of confident coefficients getting mothers’ and you may fathers’ most useful age including are a comparable or is actually quite smaller if the a couple of parameters are within the same picture (Model 3). As the point guess having fathers’ finest years (0.07) is a little larger than that of mothers’ (0.05), which difference between the fresh coefficients is not statistically extreme.
Desk step three
Coefficients and you can robust important problems off average the very least squares regressions away from kid’s most readily useful decades at wedding (attitudes) (n = 1562)
* p step one ) and hypothesis step 3 you to definitely parents’ time perceptions directly determine kid’s criterion, net away from children’s individual thinking (Arrow 3, Fig. 1 ). The new purchased logistic regression different types of kid’s expectation from how in the near future they will marry was listed in Dining table 4 . Models step 1–cuatro measure time attitudes since top years during the wedding, while Habits 5–8 measure time attitudes from the researching kid’s standard decades towards the selection of appropriate age.
Dining table 4
Kid’s and mothers’ finest age did connect with children’s requirement. Sure enough, when pupils as well as their moms and dads appreciated old finest age, pupils have been decreased probably expect to wed soon. Specifically, the chances ratios to have ideal decades at wedding was 0.80 for the children (Model 1) and you may 0.93 having parents (Design dos) (Desk 4 ). By contrast, the odds proportion having dad’s better period of 0.97 is close to you to and never statistically high (Model step 3, Dining table 4 ). These effects also are independent; on complete design with all of about three family’s finest age, the odds percentages hold nearly regular (Model 4, Desk 4 ).
The point rates strongly recommend kid’s own ideal years contains the better impact on the requirement, if you are mom’s greatest age try smaller influential and you will fathers’ top decades features a little determine otherwise not one anyway. Adjusted Wald assessment demonstrate that the odds percentages on kid’s most readily useful decades differ somewhat on the chances percentages both for mom’s and you may dad’s best ages. Although not, the effects out-of mothers’ and you can fathers’ greatest years towards the children’s criterion don’t differ significantly.
Whenever calculating timing perceptions because of the researching kid’s many years to your acceptable wedding age brackets for a person of its gender, there is certainly after that proof you to definitely pupils and you may parents try both important, however in various methods. Whenever child’s ages are compared to their particular timing perceptions, a definite “too soon” feeling is provided. In case it is over 5 years “too early,” youngsters keeps regarding the you to-half of chances off hoping to wed in the future than the when it is 3–five years “too quickly” (Models 5 and 8). The purpose estimates of just one.31 (Model 5) and you can 1.thirty-five (Model 8) recommend that if it’s this new “right time” pupils keeps better likelihood of expecting to get married soon versus if it is step 3–5 years “too quickly,” however these consequences are not mathematically significant. The purpose estimate for children below the fresh new acceptable assortment, in the step one–2 yrs “too early,” means he is a little very likely to be prepared to get married in the future which have point rates of 1.17 (Model 5) and 1.thirteen (Model 8), nevertheless these consequences are maybe not mathematically high.